We’ve reported elsewhere about the 34 major companies that have already signed the global union Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh, in the aftermath of the horrific Rana Plaza disaster. And we’re urging people to help the families of the victims with our TUC Aid Dhaka Disaster Appeal.

But this weekend, we’re also asking you to persuade two other companies to sign up to the Accord and help ensure there are no further atrocities: Debenhams and Gap. Both are involved in discussions with IndustriALL and UNI Global – the worldwide textile and retail worker unions about signing the Accord. We think some public pressure could make the difference and get them to put their words into action.

Please sign our e-action, and encourage your friends, family and workmates to sign up too. We hope we can welcome both companies to the list of Accord-backing list soon.

Continue Reading ...

Posted on May 17th, 2013 by Owen Tudor filed under: Global solidarity

Three weeks ago, over 1,100 textile workers were killed when the Rana Plaza building collapsed near Dhaka, Bangladesh. By the stroke of midnight yesterday, over thirty of the world’s biggest retail and textile companies (including Tesco, Primark, Sainsbury’s, Next, Marks and Spencer, New Look and John Lewis) signed up to the IndustriALL/UNI-Global Accord on Building and Fire Safety in Bangladesh.

These horrific and historic weeks have shown the power of global solidarity.  Emails asking fashion retailers to sign the Accord were sent by almost 1 million people via Avaaz and over 85,000 people via Change.org.  When this effort was combined with campaigns by global union federations IndustriALL and UNI-Global and national trade union confederations like the TUC (with our 2p wage campaign that went viral and reached over a third of a million Facebook users), the need for companies to act was overwhelming.

Now it is time for global solidarity to support trade unions in Bangladesh to enable them to play a real part in the safety programmes that the Accord will launch.  Today TUC Aid is launching an appeal for donations to help the families of ready-made garment workers in Dhaka.  You can give on line, persuade friends, families and workmates to do the same, or send a cheque made out to TUC Aid Dhaka Disaster to TUC Aid, Congress House, Great Russell Street, London WC1B 3LS.

Continue Reading ...

Posted on May 16th, 2013 by Rosa Crawford filed under: Global solidarity

When the Health and Safety Executive was set up, almost forty years ago, it was considered important that it had the confidence of both employers and employees and rightly so. For that reason the Health and Safety Commission was set up to agree any new regulations. There were three worker representatives (proposed by the TUC), three employers representatives (proposed by employers’ groups) and up to three others. No decision could be made without the support of both employers and employee representatives. This meant that any changes to health and safety law were seen to have come about by consensus, achieved through a common purpose of improving health and safety in the workplace.

This system has survived almost intact, although there have been some changes. When the Commission was replaced with a Board the membership was expanded from a maximum of 9 to 11, although the three worker and three employer representatives remained. Also in recent years decisions have been made which did not have the support of both sides of industry, such as the decision to exempt some self-employed people from health and safety laws.

Continue Reading ...

Posted on May 8th, 2013 by Kevin Rowan filed under: Health and Safety

Today’s Queen’s speech announced that there will be a new Deregulation Bill. This will, among other things, take those self-employed who pose no risk to others from the scope of the Health and Safety at Work Act.

Now at present the situation is simple. If you are self-employed, you have a legal duty to ensure that you protect others from harm resulting from your work activity. This covers all self-employed people. It is pretty straightforward and it works. There is no confusion and it means that everyone is very clear that no-one can take risks with others safety or health, even if they are self-employed.

The Government now plans to change this so that any person whose work activity poses no risk to anyone else will not be covered. Now that may seem to be common sense – until you think about it for about 2 seconds.

Continue Reading ...

Posted on May 8th, 2013 by Hugh Robertson filed under: Health and Safety

I blogged in April about the case of Andy Hall, a British labour rights activist who is being sued for criminal defamation by the Natural Fruit Company of Thailand over a report he helped Finnwatch (who, strangely, the company is not suing) to write, revealing serious human rights abuses in the company’s pineapple operation, including child labour. The penalties, if he is convicted, would be draconian – a huge fine and a possible prison sentence. But, as is so common in cases where employers or governments use legal threats to silence legitimate criticism, the case keeps being postponed because the employer has failed to produce its evidence, still less provide a statement of their case to Andy and his lawyers so that they can prepare their defence. The latest delay is until 8 July!

If you find this attempt to silence criticism as outrageous as I do, please join nearly 9,000 trade unionists worldwide and take a moment to let the Thai employers and authorities know that we don’t like the way Thailand’s courts are being abused by a bad employer. We’re seeking publicity for Andy’s case, and are pressing the UK Government to raise the issue formally with the Thai Government, as well as working with global unions and the ILO.

Continue Reading ...

Posted on May 7th, 2013 by Owen Tudor filed under: Global solidarity

IndustriALL General Secretary Jyrki Raina marchers calling for justice for workers killed in the Dhaka tragedy. Photo IndustriALL

I blogged last week about what you can do to help Bangladeshi workers prevent more tragedies like the Dhaka factory collapse that has now claimed over 610 lives and the Tazreen factory fire which claimed 112 in November. Now global e-petition machine Avaaz has joined the union campaign, encouraging its millions of supporters globally to pressurise the multinational brands to sign the factory safety agreement that global union federation IndustriALL has proposed.

Please sign that petition and encourage as many of your friends, family and workmates to do so. The deadline set by IndustriALL is 15 May, so there are only a few days left for the multinationals who have profited out of low wages to do the right thing (you can also make a donation to IndustriALL’s fund for the humanitarian effort in Savar – the area around the Rana Plaza factory).

Continue Reading ...

Posted on May 6th, 2013 by Owen Tudor filed under: Global solidarity

Garment workers in a Bangladesh clothing factory. Photo: Jankie

In the aftermath of the death toll in Bangladesh’s worst ever factory disaster last week, much has been written (including by us!) about what needs to be done to prevent further tragedies. Most attention has focused on what the Bangladesh government and multinational clothing companies should do, with a fair amount of blame being mis-directed (more on that in another blog) at cash-strapped, bargain-hunting western consumers.

One element of the online debate has been about what sort of terms and conditions of employment are appropriate for workers in Bangladesh’s Ready Made Garment (RMG) sector. The usual canard about not pricing them out of their jobs has been raised, so I thought I should address that specifically, because it’s being used to attack unions’ and campaigners’ attempts to demand better wages and safer workplaces.

Continue Reading ...

Posted on May 3rd, 2013 by Owen Tudor filed under: Global solidarity