From the TUC

Social Networking union style

12 Dec 2008, By

It seems that no campaign is complete these days without someone setting up the ubiquitous accompanying Facebook group. Some of these have been really successful, some really haven’t. I’m a big fan of anything that can help unions organising but I think there are a couple of potential pitfalls in using Facebook so liberally.

The first is that Facebook isn’t a substitute for doing all the other things you need to do if you want to run a successful campaign. Getting loads of people to sign up to a Facebook group to show their support for your campaign is good, but in and of itself its of limited value. Few employers are likely to buckle because a couple of thousand (in most cases actually a couple of hundred or dozen) sign up to a Facebook group calling on them to give union recognition/treat their workers fairly/honour the agreement they have with the union etc. Facebook may be a ‘sexy’ element of most campaigns these days, but I’m not sure how effective it’s really been in the majority of cases.

The second big drawback is the lack of control that users have over the information that is gathered via Facebook, and how you can use that information. Eric Lee has explained this, and some of the other potential pitfalls of using Facebook and other proprietary social networking sites,  very succinctly here.

All of which is not to say that Facebook doesn’t hold any value for unions, but its important that we are aware of its limitations.

This all a bit of preamble to welcoming the development of unionbook– a social networking site for trade unionists – which I’d encourage readers of this blog to sign up to. Eric explains the rationale behind unionbook here.

2 Responses to Social Networking union style

  1. Alex White
    Jun 13th 2009, 1:36 pm

    I don’t see the utility of Unionbook as an organising tool. These online social networks are only useful as organising tools if they have a large user base.

    Unionbook seems very limited to social networking between unionists (which I understand is its purpose).

  2. Paul Nowak

    Paul
    Jun 14th 2009, 8:50 pm

    Hi Alex

    I’d agree that Unionbook has a limited value as an organising tool, mainly due to its scale – but I wouldn’t write it off completely. I could see how union organisers could use it to get the word out about a campaign or mobilisation, knowing that those who receive the message are (probably) dedicated trade unionists who at the very least can be relied on to spread the message through their own networks (probably then using facebook et al to do so), turn up to events etc.

    But like you say, I think unionbook is less a campaigning/organising tool and more a social networking tool for trade unionists – which is useful in an of itself.