• union banners from the Wapping dispute

    With a heightened interest in Rupert Murdoch and his empire, it’s handy the TUC are currently hosting a new exhibition: ‘News International Wapping – 25 Years on’ – The strike that made the modern media.

    The Wapping dispute marked the beginning of the end of Fleet Street, it was a turning point for the British press and for the already controversial Rupert Murdoch.

    Murdoch had been making crippling demands on his papers’ print workers, including the right for management to change T&Cs whenever and however they wanted, the end of closed shops, and a ban on all industrial action. A strike began on 24th January 1986, and Murdoch switched production to a new facility in Wapping, undermining the unionised workers.

    The exhibition takes you through it all, offering historical context to the current turbulent fortunes of Murdoch’s media empire. The origins of Fleet Street and Murdoch’s rise, through the start of the strike, the boycotts and the police riots, on to where the unions are today. It finishes with the question; is Murdoch really unstoppable?

    The exhibition is produced by the Marx Memorial Library. It’s free to view and can been seen in the foyer of Congress House (Great Russell Street, London) until August 12th.

    Continue Reading ...

    Posted on July 28th, 2011 by StrongerUnions filed under: Union news

  • I noticed in my recent edition of History Today a short article referring to a report by the British Academy, History for the Taking:Perspectives on material heritage, which shows that the government spending cuts and rushed legislation risk destroying Britain’s cultural heritage irreparably.

    Sir Barry Cunliffe, Britain’s leading archaeologist, writes in the report that:

    “cultural heritage is a finite and diminishing resource and there is a need for constant vigilance particularly at a time of economic constraint. When there are cuts to be made by national or local government, heritage is always the soft option, as we can see in the 32% cut in government support for English Heritage in the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review, and the savage cuts currently being made in the number of conservation officers employed in local government. Loss of expertise on this scale will be devastating.

    It is even more  worrying coming at a time when the Localism Bill is proposing to diminish significantly the protection given to the settings of listed buildings and to conservation areas. One cannot help feeling that insufficient thought has been given to these matters: this is not surprising since the legislation is being rushed and consultation has been minimal.”

    He goes on to say:

    “Cultural heritage is too important and too subtle an issue to be left in the care of busy politicians unaided by sound academic guidance.”

    Just shows you what can happen if you leave your cultural inheritance to an IT expert and a lawyer, culture ministers Jeremy Hunt and Ed Vaisey respectively.

    For a copy of the report go to the BA report’s web page

     

    Continue Reading ...

    Posted on July 21st, 2011 by Tom Mellish filed under: Union campaigns

  • You would have thought that if there were a proved way of cutting workplace deaths by a half, and making cutting all injuries by about a quarter then employers and the Government would jump at it.

    Well there is and it is called union health and safety representatives.

    The TUC has just updated and republished its report on the effect that unions have on health and safety taking into account new research over the past six years and surprise, surprise, the new evidence shows that the Union Effect is just as strong as ever. Among the new research is a government report that claims British Industry saved between £181m and £578m each year as a result of lost time reduction from occupational injuries and work-related illnesses of between 286,000 and 616,000 days as a result of trade union representatives.

    Yet in the workplace, instead of finding employers jumping over themselves to encourage union representatives and joint safety committees, health and safety representatives still find it an uphill battle to get their employers to give them access to time off or to consult them. A TUC survey of health and safety representatives showed that time off was the biggest problem for representatives, including time off for training. The survey also found that only 28% of employers automatically consulted their representatives on a frequent basis.

    However despite the problems that union health and safety representatives have they still make a massive difference. The real problem is in those workplaces that are not unionised. For several years the TUC has called on the government to give workers in non-unionised workplaces the right to safety representatives and safety committees, but even better than that would be for the government and employers organisations to encourage workers in these workplaces to join a union. Unfortunately, I doubt that is going to happen so instead we are going to have to do it ourselves by using reports like “The Union Effect” to show workers that, if they value their health and their safety they need to join a union!

    So use this publication in your workplace, and with any organising and recruitment activity. It really  says it all. The Union Effect can be read or downloaded at the TUC website,  and also don’t forget the report on the union advantage in other areas that the TUC produced in 2009 “The Union Advantage”.

    Continue Reading ...

    Posted on July 13th, 2011 by Hugh Robertson filed under: Rights at work

  • As part of its new Building Stronger Unions training programme the TUC is pleased to announce details of the TUC Young Leaders course.

    The course is aimed at young activists and in particular, but not exclusively, those who are members of union young members committees and networks. The programme will be delivered over two, two day modules and will consider the strategic challenges that unions face in building membership and increasing both participation and the effectiveness of campaigns.

    The aim of the course will be to provide participants with a detailed overview of the state of union membership and equip them with strategies that will enable them to make an effective contribution to the discussions and strategies employed within their respective organisations.

    The course will include sessions, delivered by TUC staff and guest speakers from unions and academic partners, on the following;

    • Union membership long term trends and effectiveness of union representation
    • Strategic Choice
    • Union resources
    • Strategic campaigning

    Dates for the course, which will be delivered at the TUC, Congress House, London are;

    • Module 1 – January 19th and 20th 2012
    • Module 2 – March 29th and 30th

    The cost of the programme is £200 per person which covers materials and meals but not travel and accommodation. All applications will need to be supported by an appropriate senior official. Application forms are available from either Joanne Adams jadams@tuc.org.uk or Becky Wright at bwright@tuc.org.uk

    Continue Reading ...

    Posted on July 8th, 2011 by Carl Roper filed under: Union organising

  • I’m really pleased to say that the OA Programme 2011-12 is now available to download.

    During the six months I’ve been on the Academy, I’ve had time to look at the existing courses we offer to unions, taught them and even surveyed union staff asking what they need in terms of organising and campaigning. 

    Overwhelmingly, what we heard is that the dismantling of existing ways of bargaining is going to have a massive impact on unions’ capacity.  Our programme had to address this and ensure that unions have the skills and knowledge they need to tackle the upcoming challenges. 

    So, adding to our existing courses, the Diploma in Organising and the Advanced Certificate in Organising, now we have:

    Communities and Coalitions – helping unions to build effective community coalitions and campaigns

    Strategic Research, Bargaining and Campaigning – bridging the gap between organising, research and bargaining, helping union staff to effectively negotiate locally.

    Strategic Research – showing how good recent is the cornerstone for organising.

    Communications and Campaigns – hlpeing union staff to speak in public and use new social media to mobilise members.

    Also, I’m extremely pleased that we have created the Award in Supporting Organising which has been designed for union staff members in administrateive and other support roles to give them a clear understanding of organising and how they can help build the union.

    If you would like to apply for a place on one of our courses, fill in the application form and send over to us at orgainisingacademy@tuc.org.uk

    Before I sign off, I must also mention the great help that our colleagues at Ruskin College have given us, especially our Project Worker, Mark Everden.

    Continue Reading ...

    Posted on July 5th, 2011 by Becky Wright filed under: Union organising

  • These two pictures, designed by Amy Jackson for Unions21, show what unions are up against when attempting to present a positive image through the media.

    In this first image, the size of each word represents the frequency it was used in press releases issued by five of the largest unions over a fortnight in spring 2011:

    But in the image below, the size of each word shows the number of times it was actually used in articles featuring unions in the Guardian, Times, Telegraph, Daily Mail, Sun and Mirror:

    While journalists are receiving press releases from unions about negotiations, fairness, customers and agreements, they are writing stories about strikes, turmoil, irresponsibility, war and ransom.

    Findings of recent Unions 21 and TUC research into young peoples’ attitudes to unions showed that though the young people surveyed had some positive word associations with trade unionism. Words such as ‘campaigning’, ‘advice’ and ‘rights’ ‘fairness’, ‘togetherness’, and ‘protection’. On the downside, were many negative connotations which came to the young people’s minds such as ‘trouble-makers’, ‘scaremongering’ and ‘disagreements’.

    So, we brought together a panel of people who work, or have worked, in the world of communications to give us the hard truth about what they think unions could do to update their image. Their views are published in the paper: The Future for Union Image, to be published on Monday by Unions21.

    NUJ General Secretary Michelle Stanistreet said in her contribution that partial, subjective or inaccurate reporting of union activities is partly due to the chronic understaffing of newsrooms and the loss of industrial correspondents. Part of the job of unions, then, is to understand the benefit of investing in their press office to assist journalists in getting positive stories into the media.

    Michelle also recommends that the members unions put in front of the media, for example at conferences, should be broadly representative of the cross section of ages, of gender, of race that our movement represents.

    Writer and trainer Paul Richards’ advice is to drop the jargon – he argues that Trade unionism, like every other walk of life, has developed its own slang, jargon and insiders-only language, every bit as impenetrable as polari, doctors’ slang, cockney rhyming slang, computer hackers’ slang. He reminds us that talking about Collective bargaining, Constructive dismissal and Transfers of Undertakings is language entirely impenetrable to most people and off-putting and alienating to many.

    Tim Finch from the IPPR has an optimistic analysis: That unions have a once in a generation opportunity to shift the paradigm back in our favour. Though, he notes that unions need to consider the risk of any situation where winning a narrow argument in the media could cause a loss of sympathy with the wider public.

    Tim suggests that communications teams have to work harder to highlight the work unions do outside of industrial action. Positive individual stories unions could share with the media include those of the hundreds of thousands of working people who are involved in a learning opportunity delivered through their union, and supported by unionlearn, every year.

    Branding professional Joe Goldberg says unions need to understand how their audience has changed, and create a new brand offer to the ‘squeezed middle’ and those working in sectors with low membership density.

    Social Media professional Mike Harris reminds us that we can by-pass the tradition media by using the internet. He recommends unions should perform a social media audit to identify their most highly networked members and involve them in delivering their communications. High profile supporters can be used to attract new interest online and well crafted online ‘asks’ can be used to build support and membership.

    Bill Ivory, who wrote the script for the film Made in Dagenham, calls on unions to provide the big personalities and narratives that help people see them as makers of social drama and change.

    As with all Unions21’s work – this publication has been produced to stimulate debate and the discussion will continue at launch events in Parliament and TUC Congress. The full text of the publication will be on the Unions21 website from Monday 4th July.

    GUEST POST: Dan Whittle has been Director of Unions21 since 2008, before which he worked for a Labour MP and was Chair of the Unite Parliamentary Staff Branch.

    Continue Reading ...

    Posted on July 1st, 2011 by Dan Whittle filed under: Union campaigns