Rights at work

  • unpaid, unfair, illegalOn Monday the TUC, NUS and intern campaign groups launched a year of activity aimed at finally ending the practice of non-payment of people on internships. Deputy General Secretary Frances O’Grady for the TUC and Dannie Grufferty, VP Society & Citizenship, for the NUS formally launched the campaign.  We were joined by Hazel Blears MP, Michelle Stanistreet General Secretary of the NUJ and Gus Baker from Interns Aware.  Interns past and present made up a significant proportion of the audience and a number shared their (mainly bad) experiences (being told to walk your ‘employer’s’ dog and clean up its mess anyone??!!).

    Our campaign will put pressure on employers by naming and shaming those who willfully break the law and exploit interns – the NUS will be targeting employers who use student employment agencies.  Unions and the TUC will be making sure that interns not only know their rights but just as importantly, have a way of enforcing them.  The TUC will be launching its Rights for Interns smart phone app via the Apple and Android App Stores at the end of March.

    Continue Reading ...

    Posted on February 14th, 2012 by Carl Roper filed under: Rights at work

  • We’ve co-published a pamphlet on European social and employment laws this morning with our friends at the Foreign Policy Centre (and in partnership with the European Commission). It sounds like a pretty dry read (honest, it isn’t!) but the issues addressed are fundamental to future union organisation and our ability to deliver for working people.

    Continue Reading ...

    Posted on February 10th, 2012 by Owen Tudor filed under: Rights at work

  • Workers are facing an onslaught by the government on their ability to claim compensation. There are three proposals to strip us of our rights being considered at the moment.

    While chief executives seem to manage to get huge sums of compensation when they are sacked or resign after screwing up, us lesser mortals have only been able to look on with envy. However when we are sacked unfairly we have at least been able to rely on our unions and, as a last resort, an Employment Tribunal. The government wants to either stop that or make it more expensive. As well as changing the time you have to have been working for your employer to be able to make a claim to an Employment Tribunal from one year to two years they plan to charge us for the pleasure of seeking any form of justice.  Applicants will be obliged to pay the costs of an unfair dismissal claim which will only be refunded if the employee wins.

    The government is proposing to charge £200 to lodge a claim and £1000 for a  hearing, They have given another option of an upfront fee of £500 to access the Tribunal that can rise to £1750 if the employee is claiming more than £30,000 in compensation. The fees will be even higher if a worker believed they were sacked because of their sex, race, disability, age, sexual orientation or religion and belief.

    Continue Reading ...

    Posted on February 1st, 2012 by Hugh Robertson filed under: Rights at work

  • Today we have seen a speech from David Cameron and an article by him in the London Evening Standard, saying he wants to end the health and safety culture and the burden on business that it creates. They represent probably the biggest verbal assault on health and safety by a senior politician for many years, which is saying something, given that only last summer the PM was blaming the English riots on our health and safety culture.

    I wish we had a health and safety culture in the UK. Instead we have two million people with an illness or injury caused by their work, and every year well over 20,000 people who die prematurely because of their work. The vast majority of these could have been prevented had their employer had taken the correct precautions.

    Both the speech and the newspaper article are a response to grumbles from the business lobby and the rantings of right-wing commentators.

    Continue Reading ...

    Posted on January 5th, 2012 by Hugh Robertson filed under: Rights at work

  • An interesting footnote to the global union submission to the autumn meetings of the International Financial Institutions (the IMF and the World Bank) might be of interest to trade unionists constantly being told that they need to give up their hard won employment rights to be competitive in global labour markets. Basically, the IMF can’t make up their mind who’s got the toughest labour laws at the moment.

    Continue Reading ...

    Posted on September 19th, 2011 by Owen Tudor filed under: Rights at work

  • Domestic workers

    Domestic workers celebrate the passing of Convention 189 on Domestic Workers at the ILO's 100th Session in Geneva in June this year. Photo: © International Labour Organization

    Last week, I had to give a presentation to the Solicitors International Human Rights Group (SIHRG), on the topic ‘International Labour Standards: How effective is the current system?’ The main temptation was to simply say ‘not very’ and leave it at that, but the calibre of the audience demanded a rather more structured response.

    When it comes to actually establishing international labour standards, the system might not be the Rolls Royce of global governance structures, but it’s definitely in the high end range compared to many of the other areas where we’re crying out for globally agreed standards, such as finance sector regulation or controls on tax evasion and avoidance.

    Continue Reading ...

    Posted on September 16th, 2011 by Sam Gurney filed under: Rights at work

  • The Guardian Comment is Free site on Sunday featured a piece by Peter Lazenby on the attack on facility time by right wing extremists.  Our comment is below.  Peter’s original article is here

    Of course such actions by Conservative led Councils are motivated less by concern for ‘costs to council tax payers’ and more by an ideologically driven antipathy (and in some cases hatred) towards unions. They also fly in the face of the facts.

    In September last year the TUC published a paper called ‘The Facts About Trade Union Facility Time’.  The paper contained evidence that the presence of union reps in workplaces not only benefited individual employees, but the organisations themselves. Union reps were found to play a significant part in increasing productivity, making workplaces safer, reducing the costs of recruitment and helping organisations become more responsive to change by helping staff acquire new skills in addition to updating those they already have.

    The most recent comprehensive assessment of the contribution by union reps towards improved business performance was made by the then Department of
    Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR, now BIS) in 2007 as part of a review of union reps facilities and facility time. The report found that the work of union reps resulted in;

    · Savings to employers and the exchequer of between £22m-£43m as a result of reducing the number of Employment Tribunal cases;
    · Benefits to society worth between £136m-£371m as a result of reducing working days lost due to workplace injury and;
    · Benefits to society worth between £45m-£207m as a result of reducing work related illness

    It’s facts like these that the right wing zealots to be found on the Tory back benches, within council council chambers and hidden away in shadily funded organisations such as the so-called Tax Payers Alliance choose to ignore.  Ask many individual employees and employers and you get a different story of conscientious individuals volunteering to help their colleagues and by default the organisations for which they work making the workplace fairer and at the same time more efficient.

    Bargaining to Organise, TUC resources to help reps defend and improve facility time, are available from the TUC website here 

    Continue Reading ...

    Posted on August 2nd, 2011 by Carl Roper filed under: Rights at work